盾尾刷更换时不同冻结加固方案温度场数值对比分析

兰州理工大学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (6): 119-126.

盾尾刷更换时不同冻结加固方案温度场数值对比分析

杨宁^1,2,3, 赵美霞^1,2, 陈璐⁴, 胡俊^*4

1.江苏建筑职业技术学院建筑建造学院, 江苏徐州 221116;
2.江苏建筑节能与建造技术协同创新中心, 江苏徐州 221116;
3.山东科技大学山东省土木工程防灾减灾重点实验室, 山东青岛 266590;
4.海南大学土木建筑工程学院, 海南海口 570228

收稿日期:2022-02-21 出版日期:2024-12-28 发布日期:2025-01-13
通讯作者: 胡俊(1983-),男,四川乐山人,博士,教授,博导.Email:hj7140477@hainanu.edu.cn
基金资助:
江苏省高等学校自然科学研究项目(23KJA560004),江苏建筑节能与建造技术协同创新中心青年博士基金(SJXTBZ2112),江苏高校“青蓝工程”资助,海南省重点研发计划高新技术方向项目(ZDYF2024GXJS001),海南大学协同创新中心科研项目(XTCX2022STB09),海口市科技计划重点研发项目(2023-012)

Numerical simulation comparative analysis of temperature field of different freezing and strengthening schemes for replacement of shield tail brush

YANG Ning^1,2,3, ZHAO Mei-xia^1,2,3, CHEN Lu⁴, HU Jun⁴

1. School of Architecture Construction, Jiangsu Vocational Institute of Architectural Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China;
2. Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Building Energy Saving and Construct Technology,Xuzhou 221116, China;
3. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering Disaster Prevention and Mitigation, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China;
4. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China

Received:2022-02-21 Online:2024-12-28 Published:2025-01-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 更换盾尾刷时,防治盾尾渗漏是盾构隧道施工过程重难点.针对管片上放射性直接打孔一圈(方案1)、盾尾冻结管+预埋冻结管管片(方案2)和设置2根环形冻结管(方案3)更换盾尾刷时三种不同的冻结加固方案,分别建立数值模型对比分析各方案形成的冻土幕温度场的发展规律.结果表明:三种方案最终形成的冻土幕可有效防治盾尾渗漏,所形成的冻土帷幕体积方案3＞方案2＞方案1;盾尾间隙交圈密封时间分别为17天、2天和5天,该处冻结效果方案2＞方案3＞方案1;方案1改进措施为一圈放射状冻结管尽量靠近盾尾间隙布设,方案2和3在实际工程中均可采用;在盾尾刷更换时冻结加固方案建议采用方案3.

关键词: 盾尾刷更换, 冻结法, 环形冻结, 温度场, 数值模拟

Abstract: How to prevent shield tail leakage when replacing shield tail brushes is an important and difficult pointduring shield tunnel construction. In this paper, the shield tail brushes were replaced by ‘directly drilling a circle of radioactive holes on the pipe segment’ (scheme 1), ‘shield tail freezing tube and pre-embedded freezing tube segment’ (scheme 2) and ‘setting 2 annular freezing tubes’ (scheme 3), and a numerical model was established to compare and analyze the development law of the temperature field of the frozen soil curtain formed by each scheme. The results show that the frozen soil curtain formed by the three schemes can effectively prevent shield tail leakage, and the volume of the frozen soil curtain formed by scheme 3 is greater than scheme 2 and scheme 1. The sealing time for the gap between the shield tail and the ring is 17 days, 2 days, and 5 days, respectively. The freezing effect at this location of scheme 2 is greater than scheme 3, and the scheme 1 has the worst effect.The improvement measure for scheme 1 is to arrange a radial freezing tube as close as possible to the gap between the shield tails. Scheme 2 and scheme 3 can be adopted in practical engineering,and it is recommended to adopt scheme 3 for freezing reinforcement during the replacement of the shield tail brush.

Key words: replacement of shield tail brush, freezing method, annular freezing, temperature field, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

U455

杨宁, 赵美霞, 陈璐, 胡俊. 盾尾刷更换时不同冻结加固方案温度场数值对比分析[J]. 兰州理工大学学报, 2024, 50(6): 119-126.

YANG Ning, ZHAO Mei-xia, CHEN Lu, HU Jun. Numerical simulation comparative analysis of temperature field of different freezing and strengthening schemes for replacement of shield tail brush[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University of Technology, 2024, 50(6): 119-126.

参考文献

[1] 陶云超.海瑞克盾构机盾尾刷更换技术研究[J].铁道建筑技术,2018(3):77-80.
[2] 胡俊.高水压砂性土层地铁大直径盾构始发端头加固方式研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2012.
[3] 戚翼,王平.浅埋暗挖隧道围岩变形特性分析[J].森林工程,2019,35(2):107-111.
[4] 胡俊,欧阳素娟,李春芳,等.新型管幕冻结法不同冻结管布置方案温度场数值分析[J].森林工程,2018,34(3):86-92.
[5] 倪健,陈甦,王彬,等.地铁盾构隧道长期沉降的灰色关联分析[J].森林工程,2018,34(1):71-74.
[6] LIU Y,HU J,XIAO H W,et al.Effects of material and drilling uncertainties on artificial ground freezing of cement-admixed soils[J].Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2017,54(12):1659-1671.
[7] 马俊,胡导云,杨平.平面斜交联络通道水平冻结及实测分析[J].隧道建设(中英文),2019,39(12):1965-1972.
[8] 王晨星,刘远才,刘德稳.基于土体冻结理论在地铁施工中的应用[J].森林工程,2018,34(2):89-94.
[9] 杜娟,刘冰洋,申彤彤,等.有机质浸染砂水泥土的力学特性及本构关系[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(2):140-147.
[10] 杨平,刘健鹏,张婷.含盐冻土物理力学特性研究现状与展望[J].林业工程学报,2019,4(6):11-19.
[11] 陈成,杨平,张婷.液氮冻结盾尾密封加固温度场的数值分析[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2012,36(3):120-124.
[12] 陈成,杨平,张婷,等.长距离液氮冻结加固高承压富含水层温度实测研究[J].岩土工程学报,2012,43(11):145-150.
[13] 张彪,孙宇坤.液氮冻结法更换盾构尾刷的施工监测分析[J].煤炭工程,2011,43(11):51-53.
[14] 胡俊,张皖湘,汪磊,等.一种盾尾刷更换时环形冻结加固止水结构及其施工方法:CN105840202B[P].2019-09-03.
[15] 胡向东,程烨尔.盾构尾刷冻结法更换的温度场数值分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2009,28(S2):3516-3525.
[16] HU J,LIU Y,LI Y P,et al.Artificial ground freezing in tunnelling through aquifer soil layers:a case study in Nanjing metro line 2[J].KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering,2018,22(10):4136-4142.
[17] HU J,LIU W B,PAN Y T,et al.Site measurement and study of vertical freezing wall temperatures of a large-diameter shield tunnel[J].Advances in Civil Engineering,2019:8231458.
[18] HU J,LIU Y,WEI H,et al.Finite-element analysis of the heat transfer of the horizontal ground-freezing method in shield-driventunneling[J].International Journal of Geomechanics,ASCE,2017,17(10):04017080.
[19] FU Y,HU J,WU Y W.Finite element study on temperature field of subway connection aisle construction via artificial ground freezing method[J].Cold Regions Science and Technology,2021,189:103327.
[20] 吴雨薇.南宁地铁东滨区间联络通道冻结法施工温度场演变规律研究[D].海口:海南大学,2019.
[21] 李思齐,杨平,赵方舟.砾石地层冻土热物理特性研究[J].水文地质工程地质,2018,45(6):122-126.
[22] 陶勇,杨平,杨国清,等.冻融作用对海相软土压缩性及抗剪强度影响研究[J].冰川冻土,2019,41(3):637-644.
[23] 罗森诺.传热学基础手册:上册[M].齐欣译.2版.北京:科学出版社,1992.
[24] 苑中显,叶芳,陈峰,等.人工土壤冻结过程的计算机模拟[J].工程热物理学报,2000,21(4):479-483.
[25] LIU Z Q,LAI Y M.Numerical analysis for the ventilated embankment with thermal insulation layer in Qing-Tibetan Railway[J].Cold Regions Science and Technology,2005,42(3):177-184.
[26] 张学富,苏新民,赖远明,等.寒区隧道三维温度场非线性分析[J].土木工程学报,2004,37(2):47-53.