针对基坑宽度对围护结构嵌固稳定性的影响问题,将滑动面假定为直线与对数螺旋线状组合形式,按照对数螺旋线滑移面能否在基坑宽度内完全展开,将基坑定量地划分为普通基坑与窄型基坑.运用能量法分别推导出普通基坑与窄型基坑主、被动土压力对围护结构最下道支撑点的力矩,进而推导出考虑基坑宽度的嵌固稳定性安全系数计算公式,并开展对比验证及参数分析.结果表明:临界宽度既受围护结构布置形式影响又受土体参数影响;考虑基坑宽度的新嵌固稳定性计算方法在普通基坑范畴与现行规程计算结果较为接近,但对于窄型基坑,二者相差较大,基坑宽度越小差异越大;新方法得到的嵌固稳定性安全系数随着最下道支撑点距坑底距离的增大而减小,随着土体粘聚力、内摩擦角和土体与围护结构间摩擦角的增大而增大.
To investigate the influence of excavation width on the embedment stability of retaining structures, the slip surface is assumed to be a combination of a straight line and a logarithmic spiral. According to whether the logarithmic spiral slip surface can fully develop within the excavation width, excavations are quantitatively classified into ordinary excavations and narrow excavations. The energy method is employed to derive the moments of active and passive earth pressures about the lowest support point of the retaining structure for both ordinary and narrow excavations, respectively. Based on these derivations, a calculation formula for the embedment stability factor of safety that accounts for excavation width is established, followed by comparative verification and parametric analyses. The results indicate that the critical width is influenced by both the layout of the retaining structure and the soil parameters. The proposed method, which incorporates the excavation width, yields results comparable to those of current code specifications for ordinary excavations; however, for narrow excavations, significant discrepancies are observed, and the difference becomes more pronounced as the excavation width decreases. Furthermore, the factor of safety obtained by the new method decreases with increasing distance from the lowest support point to the excavation bottom, while it increases with increasing soil cohesion, internal friction angle, and friction angle between the soil and the retaining structure.
[1] 刘国彬,王卫东.基坑工程手册[M].2版.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2009:121-146.
[2] 刘炀镔,夏才初,徐晨,等.窄基坑围护墙插入深度优化解析及离心试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2020,39(3):593-607.
[3] 应宏伟,张金红,王小刚,等.有限土体刚性挡墙平动模式被动土压力试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2016,38(6): 978-986.
[4] 王崇宇,刘晓平,张家强,等.刚性墙后有限宽度土体被动滑裂面特征试验研究[J].岩土力学,2021,42(7):1839-1849.
[5] Yang M H,Tang X C,Wu Z Y.Slip surface and active earth pressure of cohesionless narrow backfill behind rigid retaining walls under translation movement mode[J].International Journal of Geomechanics,2020,20(8):04020115.
[6] Xu S Y,Lawal A I,Shamsabadi A,et al.Estimation of static earth pressures for a sloping cohesive backfill using extended Rankine theory with a composite log-spiral failure surface[J].Acta Geotechnica,2019,14(2):579-594.
[7] Xu S Y,Kannangara K K P M,Taciroglu E.Analysis of the stress distribution across a retaining wall backfill[J].Computers and Geotechnics,2018,103:13-25.
[8] 杨明辉,吴志勇,赵明华.挡墙后有限宽度土体土拱效应分析及土压力计算方法[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2020,47(3):19-27.
[9] 杨明辉,戴夏斌,赵明华,等.曲线滑裂面下有限宽度填土主动土压力计算[J].岩土力学,2017,38(7):2029-2035.
[10] 林彤,李明广,陈锦剑.基于对数螺旋滑裂面的有限宽度土体被动土压力计算方法[J].力学季刊,2022,43(1):64-74.
[11] 陈昌富,唐仁华,梁冠亭.基于混合粒子群算法和能量法主动土压力计算[J].岩土力学,2012,33(6):1845-1850.
[12] 王洪新.基坑宽度对围护结构稳定性的影响[J].土木工程学报,2011,44(6):120-126.
[13] 肖望,周旋,顾宽海.考虑基坑宽度效应的踢脚稳定计算方法[J].建筑结构,2021,51(S2):1618-1623.
[14] JGJ 120-2012 建筑基坑支护技术规程[S].
[15] 化建新,郑建国.工程地质手册[M].5版.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2018:145-188.