土层锚杆刚度系数算法改进

兰州理工大学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 132-137.

土层锚杆刚度系数算法改进

周勇^*1,2, 史占哲^1,2

1.兰州理工大学甘肃省土木工程防灾减灾重点实验室, 甘肃兰州 730050;
2.兰州理工大学西部土木工程防灾减灾教育部工程研究中心, 甘肃兰州 730050

收稿日期:2019-12-11 出版日期:2021-04-28 发布日期:2021-05-11
通讯作者: 周勇(1978-),男,湖北宣恩人,博士,教授,博导.Email:gsutzhouy@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(51568042)

Improvement of calculation method for stiffness coefficient of soil anchor

ZHOU Yong^1,2, SHI Zhan-zhe^1,2

1. Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation in Civil Engineering of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Univ. of Tech., Lanzhou 730050, China;
2. Western Center of Disaster Mitigation in Civil Engineering of Ministry of Education, Lanzhou Univ. of Tech., Lanzhou 730050, China

Received:2019-12-11 Online:2021-04-28 Published:2021-05-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 锚杆刚度系数是考虑自由段变形、锚固段变形和锚杆相对土体位移而求得的复合刚度.在现有的锚杆刚度系数计算公式推导过程中,仅考虑了自由段和锚固段的变形,而并未考虑土体的变形,不能真实反映锚头的实际位移与内力的关系.基于锚杆和土体的协同变形,利用Mindlin解,推导考虑自由段变形、锚固段变形和土体变形的锚杆刚度系数计算公式,并用MATLAB软件编写计算程序进行计算;最后结合工程实例,运用Plaxis2D进行模拟,通过位移与内力求解锚杆刚度系数,将本文计算方法和规范法进行比较.结果表明本文计算方法与模拟结果更加吻合,从而证明了本文改进方法的合理性.

关键词: 基坑, 锚杆, 刚度系数, 位移

Abstract: The stiffness coefficient of anchor is composite stiffness obtained by considering the deformation of free section, anchorage section and relative displacement of anchor to soil. In the derivation of the existing formulas for calculating the stiffness coefficient of anchor, only the deformation of free section and the anchorage section were considered, while the deformation of soil was not taken into account. The relationship between the actual displacement of anchor head and the internal force can not be truly reflected. Based on the coordinated deformation of anchor and soil, the formulas for calculating the stiffness coefficient of anchor rod considering the deformation of free section, anchorage section and soil were derived by using Mindlin solution, and the calculated codes was compiled with the software of MATLAB. Finally, combined with an engineering example, Plaxis2D was used to simulate the stiffness coefficients of anchor. The stiffness coefficients of anchor were solved by displacement and internal force. Compared with the calculation method and the standard method in this paper. The results show that the calculation method in this paper is more consistent with the simulation results.

Key words: excavation, anchor, stiffness coefficient, displacement

中图分类号:

TU470.1

周勇, 史占哲. 土层锚杆刚度系数算法改进[J]. 兰州理工大学学报, 2021, 47(2): 132-137.

ZHOU Yong, SHI Zhan-zhe. Improvement of calculation method for stiffness coefficient of soil anchor[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University of Technology, 2021, 47(2): 132-137.

[1]	宋小春, 段新国, 黄瑞, 朱彦鹏. 组合荷载下考虑摩擦增强效应的基桩承载性能研究[J]. 兰州理工大学学报, 2023, 49(3): 115-120.
[2]	饶凯, 刘彦辉, 王际凯, 黄展军, 罗如平, 石钰锋. 基坑开挖卸荷下桩基抗拔承载力影响因素研究[J]. 兰州理工大学学报, 2023, 49(2): 130-137.
[3]	任晓敏, 刘俊杰, 刘俊伟, 王晨. 滨海沼泽区地铁车站深基坑开挖变形[J]. 兰州理工大学学报, 2023, 49(2): 138-143.
[4]	周勇, 赵元基, 王正振, 熊泤哲. 基于位移梯度法的深基坑桩锚支护结构动态稳定性分析[J]. 兰州理工大学学报, 2022, 48(6): 110-119.
[5]	魏云霞. 基坑开挖对周边环境的影响分析[J]. 兰州理工大学学报, 2022, 48(6): 136-144.
[6]	孙康才. 软土地区某高层建筑地基加固现场实测及有限元分析[J]. 兰州理工大学学报, 2022, 48(3): 133-139.
[7]	蔡小玲, 俞莉, 李继明. 西北地区地铁基坑降水对周围环境影响的计算方法[J]. 兰州理工大学学报, 2022, 48(3): 140-145.
[8]	牛全福, 李月锋, 张曼, 傅建凯, 马亚娜. 基于Kalman滤波的ARIMA-NAR神经网络模型[J]. 兰州理工大学学报, 2022, 48(2): 131-135.
[9]	朱彦鹏, 李凤岐, 杨校辉, 马孝瑞, 尹利洁. 兰州地铁红砂岩基坑开挖监测与数值模拟分析[J]. 兰州理工大学学报, 2022, 48(1): 121-127.
[10]	朱彦鹏,李庚,马孝瑞,魏鹏云,刘鑫,尹利洁. 兰州红砂岩地层地铁站深基坑变形规律分析[J]. 兰州理工大学学报, 2021, 47(6): 131-137.
[11]	李有堂, 杨龙. 应力比对铝钢复合材料界面Ⅰ型裂纹应力强度因子的影响[J]. 兰州理工大学学报, 2021, 47(4): 40-44.
[12]	李忠, 丁盛环, 叶帅华. 土体参数变异性对框架锚杆加固黄土边坡可靠度影响分析[J]. 兰州理工大学学报, 2021, 47(2): 127-131.
[13]	郭雪源, 张明聚, 武立伟, 韩流涛. 装配式钢管混凝土内支撑在盾构竖井深基坑工程中的应用[J]. 兰州理工大学学报, 2020, 46(6): 131-136.
[14]	李忠, 汪红星, 张曦. 基于三维位移插值的边坡滑移面搜索模型[J]. 兰州理工大学学报, 2020, 46(6): 143-147.
[15]	杨波, 谭勇, 徐长杰. 坑底加固模式对软土深基坑变形的影响[J]. 兰州理工大学学报, 2020, 46(5): 118-123.