双重耗能智能框架摇摆墙结构地震响应对比分析

兰州理工大学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 116-124.

双重耗能智能框架摇摆墙结构地震响应对比分析

罗维刚^*1,2, 刘纪斌¹, 张杨¹, 郭易令¹, 祁盼¹, 宋江朋¹

1.兰州理工大学土木工程学院, 甘肃兰州 730050;
2.兰州理工大学甘肃省土木工程防灾减灾重点实验室, 甘肃兰州 730050

收稿日期:2019-01-27 出版日期:2021-08-01 发布日期:2021-09-07
通讯作者: 罗维刚(1975-),男,甘肃景泰人,副教授.Email:luowg@lut.cn
基金资助:
甘肃省建设科技攻关项目(JK2013-18)

Comparative analysis of seismic response of smart frame-rocking wall structure with dual energy dissipation elements

LUO Wei-gang^1,2, LIU Ji-bin¹, ZHANG Yang¹, GUO Yi-ling¹, QI Pan¹, SONG Jiang-peng¹

1. College of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Univ. ofTech., Lanzhou 730050, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation in Civil Engineering of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Univ. of Tech., Lanzhou 730050, China

Received:2019-01-27 Online:2021-08-01 Published:2021-09-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对框架剪力墙结构在强震作用下存在连接处楼板或连梁破坏以及剪力墙底部出现塑性铰的问题,在课题组开发的智能框架剪力墙双重结构体系中,将剪力墙设置为底部连接金属阻尼器的摇摆剪力墙,形成一种新型双重耗能单元控制的智能框架摇摆墙结构体系.以6层混凝土框架剪力墙结构为原型,应用ABAQUS有限元分析软件,建立传统框架剪力墙结构、智能框架剪力墙双重结构、摇摆墙与框架间连接BRB结构和摇摆墙底部连接金属阻尼器的双重耗能智能框架摇摆墙4种结构对比模型,进行非线性动力时程分析,考察各结构的动力响应.结果表明:新型双重耗能单元控制的智能框架摇摆墙结构体系在BRB屈服强度为0.1f_y~1f_y区间时,结构地震响应均比传统结构有所减小,框架结构层间位移也得到有效控制,进一步说明在合理参数取值下双重耗能单元控制的结构地震动响应小于单一耗能单元结构.

关键词: 智能框架摇摆墙结构, 双重耗能单元, 地震响应, 屈曲约束支撑, 金属阻尼器

Abstract: Directed against the issues of frame-shear wall structure floor diaphragm were damaged or coupling beam failed, and the plastic hinges appeared at the bottom of shear wall under strong earthquake, a smart frame-shear wall dual structure system with BRB passive energy dissipation in between the frame and shear-wall was developed by the author's research group, and the shear wall is set as the rocking shear wall with metal damper at the bottom. A new frame-rocking shear wall structure system with dual energy dissipation elements is set up. In this paper, a six-story reinforced concrete frame-shear wall model are established using ABAQUS as prototype, the traditional frame-shear wall structure, the smart frame-shear wall dual structure, the frame-rocking wall structure with BRB in between rocking wall and frame, and the frame-rocking shear wall structure system with dual energy dissipation elements are compared. To obtain dynamic response of each structure, the non-linear dynamic time-history analysis is conducted. Results show that when the BRB yield strength ratio is 0.1~1, the seismic responses of the frame-rocking shear wall structure with dual energy dissipation elements are less than that of traditional structure. The frame inter-storey drift is also effectively controlled. It is further explained that, under the appropriate parameter value of the BRB and MD, the seismic response of the structure with dual energy dissipation elements is smaller than that of the single energy dissipation element.

Key words: smart frame-rocking wall structure, dual energy dissipation element, seismic response, buckling restrained brace(BRB), metal damper(MD)

中图分类号:

TU375

罗维刚, 刘纪斌, 张杨, 郭易令, 祁盼, 宋江朋. 双重耗能智能框架摇摆墙结构地震响应对比分析[J]. 兰州理工大学学报, 2021, 47(4): 116-124.

LUO Wei-gang, LIU Ji-bin, ZHANG Yang, GUO Yi-ling, QI Pan, SONG Jiang-peng. Comparative analysis of seismic response of smart frame-rocking wall structure with dual energy dissipation elements[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University of Technology, 2021, 47(4): 116-124.

参考文献

[1] 曹海韵,潘鹏,叶列平,等.混凝土框架摇摆墙结构体系的抗震性能分析 [J].建筑科学与工程学报,2011,28(1):64-69.
[2] HITAKA T,SAKINO K.Cyclic tests on a hybrid coupled wall utilizing a rocking mechanism [J].Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,2010,37(14):1657-1676.
[3] GAVRIDOU S.Shake table testing and analytical modeling of a full-scale,four-story unbonded post-tensioned concrete wall building [D].Los Angeles:UCLA,2015.
[4] 杨晓燕,冯玉龙,吴京,等.底部带屈曲约束支撑的摇摆桁架抗震性能试验研究 [J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2018,48(2):303-309.
[5] 何晴光,徐力,张玉军.安装有自复位耗能摇摆柱的RC框架动力弹塑性分析 [J].兰州理工大学学报,2019,45(1):137-144.
[6] 崔浩然,吴刚,冯德成,等.损伤可控摇摆墙滞回性能分析 [J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2018,48(2):288-293.
[7] 刘迪,李万润,杜永峰,等.基于IDA分析的新型消能摇摆结构抗震性能 [J].兰州理工大学学报,2015,41(5):130-134.
[8] JIN Z,PEI S,BLOMGREN H,et al.Simplified mechanistic model for seismic response prediction of coupled cross-laminated timber rocking walls [J].Journal of Structural Engineering,2019,145(2):1-11.
[9] 曲哲,和田章.摇摆墙在框架结构抗震加固中的应用 [J].建筑结构学报,2011,32(9):11-19.
[10] BARBAGALLO F,BOSCO M,GHERSI A,et al.Seismic retrofitting of eccentrically braced frames by rocking walls and viscous dampers [J].Key Engineering Materials,2018,763(5):1105-1112.
[11] BARBAGALLO F,BOSCO M,GHERSI A,et al.Seismic retrofitting of eccentrically braced frames by rocking walls and viscous dampers [J].Key Engineering Materials,2018,763:1105-1112.
[12] 吕西林,全柳萌,蒋欢军.从16届世界地震工程大会看可恢复功能抗震结构研究趋势 [J].地震工程与工程振动,2017,37(3):5-13.
[13] 侯和涛,朱文灿,曲哲,等.屈曲约束支撑钢筋混凝土框架结构干式柔性梁柱节点的试验研究 [J].工程力学,2018,35(6):151-161.
[14] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.混凝土结构设计规范:GB 50010—2010 [S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
[15] 王义俊,汪梦甫.钢筋混凝土剪力墙塑性铰长度计算模型研究 [J].工业建筑,2016,45(5):80-85.
[16] 梁兴文,王照耀,于婧,等.钢筋混凝土剪力墙结构多塑性铰区合理布置研究 [J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2018,50(2):169-175.
[17] FEMA,ASCE.Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings[S].Washington,D.C:ASCE Standards Program,2000.