FRP筋与水泥浆界面粘结滑移特性数值模拟研究

兰州理工大学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (4): 135-141.

FRP筋与水泥浆界面粘结滑移特性数值模拟研究

王正振^*1, 梁锦添¹, 戴国亮², 周勇^1,3, 靳高明⁴, 王金科⁴

1.兰州理工大学土木工程学院, 甘肃兰州 730050;
2.东南大学土木工程学院, 南京 210096;
3.河西学院, 甘肃张掖 734000;
4.甘肃建投建设有限公司, 甘肃兰州 730050

收稿日期:2024-01-14 出版日期:2024-08-28 发布日期:2024-08-30
通讯作者: 王正振(1989-),男,甘肃白银人,博士,副教授.Email:wangzz@lut.edu.cn
基金资助:
甘肃省住房和城乡建设厅建设科技项目(JK2022-04),甘肃省青年科技基金计划(22JR5RA286)

Numerical simulation study on bond-slip performance between FRP bar and cement slurry

WANG Zheng-zhen¹, LIANG Jin-tian¹, DAI Guo-liang², ZHOU Yong^1,3 JIN Gao-ming⁴, WANG Jin-ke⁴

1. School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Univ. of Tech., Lanzhou 730050, China;
2. School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China;
3. Hexi University, Zhangye 734000, China;
4. Gansu Jiantou Construction Co. Ltd., Lanzhou 730050, China

Received:2024-01-14 Online:2024-08-28 Published:2024-08-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于试验和数值模拟方法研究FRP筋与水泥浆的粘结特性与不同因素对其粘结行为的影响.以有限元软件中的Cohesive单元模拟FRP筋与水泥浆之间的界面粘结滑移,以混凝土塑性损伤模型模拟水泥浆体的损伤与破坏行为.按试验工况及加载条件建立FRP筋-水泥浆界面粘结滑移模型.通过控制变量法研究了FRP筋类型、直径、长度等因素对界面粘结行为、粘结应力分布和破坏机制的影响。结果表明:不同纤维材料的粘结性能差异较大;增大粘结长度、筋材直径能够提高极限承载力;在加载过程中,FRP筋体轴力主要分布在加载端,随着荷载增加,靠近加载端的筋体轴力增幅大于粘结段末端;拉拔荷载达到峰值时,界面粘结单元开始破坏、界面粘结单元发生损伤,粘结强度不断下降;随着粘结-滑移曲线进入下降段,界面粘结作用逐渐失效,构件完全破坏.

关键词: FRP筋, 水泥浆, 粘结性能, 有限元模拟

Abstract: In this paper, the bond-slip performance between FRP bar and cement slurry and the influence factors on the bond performance were studied by numerical simulation and indoor test. Cohesive unit the finite element software was used to simulate the interface bond slip between FRP bar and cement slurry, and the damage and destruction behavior of cement slurry was simulated by the concrete plastic damage model. The influence factors such as FRP bar type, diameter, and length on interface bond behavior, bond stress distribution, and failure mechanism was studied through controlled variable method. The results show that the bond performance of different types of FRP bars varies greatly. Increasing the bond length and diameter of FRP bar can improve the ultimate bearing capacity. During the loading process, the axial force of FRP bar is mainly distributed at the loading end. As the load increases, the increase in axial force of the FRP bar near the loading end is greater than that at the end of the bonding section. When the pull-out load reaches its peak, the interface bond unit is damaged, and the bond strength continuously decreases. As the bond slip curve enters the descending stage, the interface bond strength gradually fails and the specimen is completely destroyed.

Key words: FRP bar, cement slurry, bond property, finite element simulation

中图分类号:

TU47

王正振, 梁锦添, 戴国亮, 周勇, 靳高明, 王金科. FRP筋与水泥浆界面粘结滑移特性数值模拟研究[J]. 兰州理工大学学报, 2024, 50(4): 135-141.

WANG Zheng-zhen, LIANG Jin-tian, DAI Guo-liang, ZHOU Yong JIN Gao-ming, WANG Jin-ke. Numerical simulation study on bond-slip performance between FRP bar and cement slurry[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University of Technology, 2024, 50(4): 135-141.

参考文献

[1] 王洋,冯君,李珈瑶,等.FRP锚杆在岩土锚固中的研究进展 [J].工程地质学报,2018,26(3):776-784.
[2] 于冬雪,于化杰,黎红兵,等.FRP建筑材料的结构性能及应用综述 [J].材料导报,2021,35(S2):660-668.
[3] 郝庆多,王言磊,侯吉林,等.GFRP带肋筋粘结性能试验研究 [J].工程力学,2008,25(10):158-165+179.
[4] 薛伟辰,康清梁.纤维塑料筋粘结锚固性能的试验研究 [J].工业建筑,1999,29(12):5-7.
[5] 高丹盈,B.Brahim.纤维聚合物筋与混凝土粘结性能的影响因素 [J].工业建筑,2001,31(2):9-14.
[6] MALVAR L J.Tensile and bond properties of GFRP reinforcing bars [J].Materials Journal,1995,92(3):276-285.
[7] COSENZA E,MANFREDI G,REALFONZO R.Behavior and modeling of bond of FRP rebars to concrete [J].Journal of composites for construction,1997,1(2):40-51.
[8] COSENZA E,MANFREDI G,REALFONZO R.Analytical modelling of bond between FRP reinforcing bars and concrete [C]//Proceedings of the Second International RILEM Symposium (FRPRCS-2).1995.
[9] 高丹盈,朱海堂,谢晶晶.纤维增强塑料筋混凝土粘结滑移本构模型 [J].工业建筑,2003,33(7):41-43+82.
[10] NASER M,HAWILEH R,ABDALLA J A,et al.Bond behavior of CFRP cured laminates:experimental and numerical investigation [J].Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology,2012,134(2):021002.
[11] BERRA M,CASTELLANI A,CORONELLI D,et al.Steel-concrete bond deterioration due to corrosion:finite-element analysis for different confinement levels [J].Magazine of Concrete Research,2003,55(3):237-247.
[12] 尹世平,李雨珊,刘运超.FRP筋与全珊瑚骨料海水混凝土粘结性能数值模拟 [J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2023,31(1):210-223.
[13] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑砂浆基本性能试验方法标准:JGJ/T 70—2009 [S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2009.
[14] 中华人民共和国建设部.普通混凝土力学性能试验方法标准:GB/T 50081—2002 [S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2002.
[15] 刘巍,徐明,陈忠范.ABAQUS混凝土损伤塑性模型参数标定及验证 [J].工业建筑,2014,44(S1):167-171+213.
[16] SIDOROFF F.Description of anisotropic damage application to elasticity [C].Springer Berlin Heidelberg,1981:237-244.
[17] 李清富,匡一航,郭威.CDP模型参数计算及取值方法验证 [J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2021,42(2):43-48.
[18] 单波,佟广权,刘其元.CFRP筋与海水海砂混凝土黏结性能试验 [J].建筑科学与工程学报,2020,37(5):113-123.
[19] WEI W,LIU F,XIONG Z,et al.Bond performance between fibre-reinforced polymer bars and concrete under pull-out tests [J].Construction and Building Materials,2019,227:116803.
[20] 陶亚文,杜志刚,丁梧秀,等.BFRP砂浆锚杆锚固黏结性能试验研究 [J].混凝土,2022(4):170-175.